Dear Benedict XVI,
I am writing this letter to outline some true facts of life that maybe you guys need to look at for maintaining future endeavours of existence.
Campaigns of propaganda (hidden underline instigations) are not tolerated anymore; that’s propaganda campaigns in labelling; campaigns in an attempt to win over numbers; campaigns consisting of contradiction to citizen rights demonstrating of lack of tolerance towards other religions and other beliefs people have in life.
That means dogging on other beliefs and religions of various cultures of the world, using bible studies to influence followers, for the purpose of negative natured literature and social group natured digging at people not of your chosen belief.
As a reminder to date, there has never been and never will be any substantial evidence to such existence of a ‘God’ that’s of one and whole. What question is really the most important beginning of the universe or the beginning of man?
Fiction is just that, a design produced for a purpose, in your case being of guidance. The bible represents a guidebook for helping people focused on idealistic ideals in ordered life.
Ideals of such are not generally taken up by followers, but rather the social connection; this may be due to the fact that throughout in the design, the references used ‘God’ and/or ‘Jesus’, rather than that of ‘Church’ such has been analysed and determined incorrect reference.
Negative ‘Circling’ styled tactics used in the past five years within studies, forums etc, focused against others has not been overlooked and recorded accordingly, that is directly related to idealistic ideals.
The people directly below you Benedict need to take some ‘Reform’ time out as a ‘Jesus Franchise’ and review the design used, such as educational material, with a focus being that of the negative impact produce from using mental sociology designs and terminology throughout.
As the face of the foundation franchise Benedict, holding the highest percentage of receptive followers in the world, that are influence through literature design, let alone over-tuned (attuned) in the focus of the literature statements been made within your books, you need to influence change via public speech.
On a purity level against all beliefs in the world, the ‘Jesus Franchise’ places last, this is assessment through the overall outcome in percentage, via the content of negative and positive design in writing within material, thinking and of cause general campaigning.
Back to basics needed, teaching from the heart (social and economic reflection stories for teaching are ok) not the mind, what is written in reference is your franchises word not that of any self proclaimed gods stated. As such what is written / spoken in reference ‘Jesus said’ or ‘God said’ is in the highest percent of statements true reference ‘The Church said’.
Philosophy is a great tool used in many religions and beliefs, so much that this has been around longer than modern man via other forms. The ‘Jesus Franchise’ is not the creators of nature’s philosophy, you are not the first organisations in the world to produce and/or use ancient scripter’s of nature’s philosophy.
Militant Jesus sure the first of your well groomed grouped life coaching design, since been followed through into bible studies to current date and to answer your thought ‘Yes’ his teachings are that of others revised into own wording and philosophy storytelling.
Why have we picked up over the years, ‘Jesus Franchise’ groups targeting other beliefs and people of freedom of choice of living, trying to convince them to commit suicide because their choices in life that are a conflict to your organisations ideals in teaching? Why have we picked up underhandedness portrayed through out of date sociology used to emphasise labelling of others as homosexuals, illegal predators’ or worst (The targeting game).
We are aware of study groups with aims of negative/negatory focused targeting; we are aware that the bill of innocents attached to such franchises is an ever expanding number direct and indirect. That means ‘VIOLENTS’ and/or ‘DEATH’ that’s occurred through influence teaching via text and speech of a negative design. One example ‘people not following the word Jesus, are of those ‘Out there’ and you will burn in eternal hell’ (public broadcast)
Back to scripter’s, I have read a few of them and determine that correctness is not of high priority but that of convenience translation (mindset not the same alignment of that of the original writer). Scripter’s though are just that scripter’s made by man for man, not gods unless they self proclaimed gods.
To answer your thought on this, scripter’s can be designed after date with the quality and material of prior. Our modern technology can determine in current date material, cloth and other, ages right down to 10 years or less.
Furthermore on scripter’s, natures philosophy has no need for scripting, history is not as hidden and reveals its self continually that cannot be re-fabricated in happening through repeated teaching, except for those of receptive qualities.
We always will be happy to remind people of origins of religions and beliefs started prior to modern man, maybe you guys should be responsible and remind people in teaching that what is thought is a guide that correctness is only that of the scripter and/or translator more regular in classes/churches etc.
Others know of the tactics used, as they are used in other industries as well being that of modern marketing, sociology to and throw, and most importantly underline designed literature of multi terminology used throughout, enthusing negative response towards others, torrance not give towards others, personal allegiance influenced for commitment.
On influence I’d just like to say a few words, when ‘just trying to help others’ by the way, love the repetitive comeback. Helping others is about helping them find their way, find confidence within themselves, help them to be more independent rather than dependant and not that of helping dependants become independent only to mind mould them to be dependants again, for purpose of allegiance, removing actual freedom to choose but replaces it with addiction instead.
On a final world; Land given still must be allocated according to international laws, a declaration of a country must meet just that a standards and self contained requirements needed prior to declaration of a country that otherwise is a province.
I’ll be in the future pushing for change to constitutions and citizens rights in the areas mentioned of ‘RELIGION’ a one categorized preference, to be amended to ‘BELIEF’ instead for modern world catering of all cultures and interests in life. ‘Her Majesty The Queen’ at past times had written this in for the purpose of maintaining strong settlement focus and social connection now no longer required to be one-sided.
Revision on life - Project 3*



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote
