View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-Apr-2007, 08:38 AM in reply to Cobra's post "Re: Sue Bradford's Anti-Smacking Bill"
Sparklechick
Sparklechick's Avatar
Sparklechick is offline
 meow
 Karma +/- Power: 108
 Karma: Sparklechick has a reputation beyond reputeSparklechick has a reputation beyond reputeSparklechick has a reputation beyond reputeSparklechick has a reputation beyond reputeSparklechick has a reputation beyond reputeSparklechick has a reputation beyond reputeSparklechick has a reputation beyond reputeSparklechick has a reputation beyond reputeSparklechick has a reputation beyond reputeSparklechick has a reputation beyond reputeSparklechick has a reputation beyond repute (2399)
  Send a message via MSN to Sparklechick
 
 Local Time: 06:52 PM
 Local Date: 24-Jul-2008
 Join Date: Jan 2004
 Age: 33
 Posts: 3,053
 Blog Entries: 1
Default Re: Sue Bradford's Anti-Smacking Bill

I'm against the bill. Let parents decide how to disclipline their children. As said above, the bill will NOT stop the parents who currently abuse their children. They WILL continue to do this. It's the innocent parents who lightly smack their kids to keep them in line that are going to suffer from this bill.

I got smacked when I was a kid and it hasn't affected me in any negative way. I've smacked my nieces when they've been bad too. They know that if they get a smack (it's never hard) it means I'm VERY serious about what I'm saying and that they're being VERY bad if they get a smack. They never do it again.

Sparklechick's Signature:
...Sparklechick...Queen of all that Sparkles...
I live in my own little world. But it's okay. They know me here
Reply With Quote